• Hello guest! Are you an Apistogramma enthusiast? If so we invite you to join our community and see what it has to offer. Our site is specifically designed for you and it's a great place for Apisto enthusiasts to meet online. Once you join you'll be able to post messages, upload pictures of your fish and tanks and have a great time with other Apisto enthusiasts. Sign up today!

removing the male

jimjon

New Member
5 Year Member
Messages
17
will it be alright if i leave the male with the female after spawning? is it a must to remove the male?
 

Z Man

New Member
5 Year Member
Messages
247
Location
Western New York
My first choice is to leave the male with her if there are other small fish in with them. If they are alone and she doesn't bother him, I leave him in as usually he will help with the fry after a few days of free swimming. But if she chases him up in a corner all the time, I remove him. Every pair is different and each time is different with the same pair. I am home all day so I can check frequently. If you are at work all day it may be a good choice to remove him. It's always a difficult decision but I myself most always remove the pot & female or the male as it's much easier.
 

Charlotte

New Member
5 Year Member
Messages
22
Location
Davis, CA
Some people prefer to remove the female, depending on who is the better parent. I had to do that with rams, and dad raised them fine.
 

Neil

New Member
Messages
1,583
Location
Sacramento, Ca.
Charlotte is correct. I have no less than 12 tanks right now with males left in. & of those tanks, 7 only have the males caring for (or at least tolerating) the fry. Additionally, out of the 70 different species and species-forms of Apistogramma that I have spawned over the last few years, I have used the male at least 25 times to raise the fry to the 4-6 week mark and have only had problems twice. Many times it is the female who wants to clear the area because she is ready to spawn again. The male has an investment in the current babies promoting his genes, because he has to rely on the female to spawn again for another chance. This doesn't always work, but I probably wouldn't be currently able to raise fry from more than 20 species in their original breeding tanks, if I didn't employ this method.
All this is not to get you to remove the female, it is simply to point out that the male can be a valuable tool in breeding and doen't have to be liability.
Neil
 

Eva32181

New Member
5 Year Member
Messages
120
Location
Gainesville, FL
Hmmm. . . I think my Borellii male might be the one picking off the baby fish. I have just the pair and their fry in a 10 gallon, and Mom seems to guarding the babies from him. It's their first spawn, so I'm just going to let whatever happens to happen. Fishy infanticide and all.
 

Neil

New Member
Messages
1,583
Location
Sacramento, Ca.
I would be inclined to remove the female. Unless you have seen the male eating the babies, it has been my experience that, more often than not, the female eats the babies because she doesn't want the male to get them. A few at a time under stress or all at once. Sometimes the male is sharp and recognizes what is going on and forces the female away and takes over. Again, this is IME and the most conventional way to deal with things is to remove the male. Without the added stress of the male in the tank (with no invaders to keep him busy and useful in the females eyes) she is more likely to deal with her young well. But I am a rebel that likes to buck the system and the males have often done well by me. I consider the female more unpredictable.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
17,952
Messages
116,530
Members
13,058
Latest member
Grey58

Latest profile posts

Josh wrote on anewbie's profile.
Testing
EDO
Longtime fish enthusiast for over 70years......keen on Apistos now. How do I post videos?
Looking for some help with fighting electric blue rams :(
Partial updated Peruvian list have more than this. Please PM FOR ANY QUESTIONS so hard to post with all the ads poping up every 2 seconds….
Top