- Messages
- 387
- Location
- Shropshire,England.
Shame that.... Didnt for one minute think of London, Ontario....
Would like to see Heiko in the UK.
Mark.
Would like to see Heiko in the UK.
Mark.
Hi,
just tell me: why are some of you guys ONLY read what you want to read and things which have not been written at all????
ie. With no word I have written anything similar such as some of you mentioned as:
1. "100% sure"
2. "... that no amateur/hobbyist can find something new..."
3. And I did not say with any word, that I am "unwilling to accept", just to mention a few of your un-correct statements (or interpretations).
ALL of these are words YOU are putting in my mouth!!!!!
I just mentioned here the existing facts, those which are recognized by the scientific community, verified through decades of field work and sampling and also which have been published. And I mentioned my findings (which with no word should be 100%, nor that I checked every single one of the 100,000 Amazon affluent creeks and rivers).
So you all better read before you spit it out and verify what you write, at least I do.
Besides of these facts (and anyone can verify them) it might be of additional interest (at least to some of you):
The giant white-water mighty Amazon river is a NATURAL barrier for many (the majority at least) of the small (and smallest) fishes between the species from the southern to the northern part (or vs. versa) and if anyone of you has been there, he can probably understand that such small species can hardly cross tenths of kilometers without being washed away, eaten, caught or killed do to the big difference of the chemical water parameters...
But I guess I am wasting my time here to pass on some valid (but never 100%) information based on science and personal experience from 330 Amazon field trips. And b.t.w.: Did anyone of you every realize that NOTHING on this planet is 100%, except for the fact that we all die. That is 100% of a fact, which no one can deny, and the only one.
Best regards anyhow from one who cannot know everything by 100% (but I know Glaser, as he worked for me for several years...).
Heiko Bleher
www.aquapress-bleher.com
On a side note, I DID collect a Dicrossus in Southern Peru back in 2005 that I guessed was close to D. maculatus. I will go back and re-collect it this year and get some decent photos of it at least. So Dicrossus range at least to 12 degrees south in Peru.
Heiko,
I DID collect a Dicrossus in Southern Peru back in 2005 that I guessed was close to D. maculatus. I will go back and re-collect it this year and get some decent photos of it at least.
Best,
Brian Perkins
WildPERU
www.nuurth.net
How interesting. This is the 2nd report of a Dicrossus species from Peru. The first could not be verified by subsequent collecting. It was from northern Peru, near Iquitos. Collecting it from the Madre de Dios system would be a very great surprise, being so far from any other known occurence of the genus. I'm not saying that it's impossible, just unlikely from a distributional point of view. After all, I know that a Crenicara species occurs in the Madre de Dios, so I'll keep an open mind for now. I would be very interested in seeing photos of the fish if you are successful at collecting it again.
Mike,
Thanks. I was pretty convinced that it is C. punctulatum or near tohttp://www.nuurth.net it ...
I think "near to it" is probably closer to the truth. Right now, I believe that it is a superspecies, sort of like A. agassizii is. It probably is several closely related species. It is found over much of the Amazon basin and into the Guianas. It appears to have a distribution pattern very similar to the regani-complex.
After reading through this entire thread another point that is overlooked is accidental introduction. This was without doubt the case with Discus the Peruvian Nanay.